VAGINAL AND CAESAREAN DELIVERY

Our products are designed to reduce variability, so you and your team can act with confidence in critical situations to protect mother and child.

group-image-csection-v2
mystic-transparent

MITYONEā„¢ VACUUM DEVICE

MityOne vacuum-assisted delivery device is designed to assist a practitioner in the delivery of an infant during childbirth.

FETAL PILLOWā„¢
CEPHALIC ELEVATION DEVICE

The Fetal Pillow is a device intended to elevate the fetal head and facilitate delivery of the fetus in women requiring a cesarean section at full dilation or after a failed instrumental vaginal delivery in gestational age ā‰„ 37 weeks.

Fetal-Pillow-Inflated-transparent-1536x1025
c-safe-transparent-v1

C SAFEā„¢ UTERINE SAFETY SCALPEL

Designed to help reduce the risk of fetal lacerations during C-sections with a specially designed distal tip.

OB/MOBIUSā„¢ RETRACTOR

Maximize C-section exposure with self-retaining elastic abdominal retractor.2

OB_Mobius-transparent
INSORB-645-image

INSORBā„¢ SUBCUTICULAR SKIN STAPLE

May reduce wound complications1 and enhance patient comfort and cosmesis2, 3* , with this trusted skin closure device.4, 5**

Color-strip-hexagons-green-2200-v1
Name(Required)
What product you are interested in?: (select all that apply)
Induction & Labor
Vaginal & C-section Delivery
Postpartum
Disclaimer

By pressing submit you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

Important Safety Information:
INSORB Subcuticular Skin Stapler is intended for use in the subcuticular closure of skin where an absorbable tissue fastener is desired for temporary tissue approximation. Contraindicated for: thin or thick tissue, and scar tissue where effective tissue capture cannot be achieved; if the needle path is obstructed, and when radiopacity or prolonged tissue approximation is necessary or desired. For detailed instructions and risk information, please refer to the Instructions for Use.

Footnotes
*Compared to metal staples in C-sections
** When used in accordance with its Instructions For Use

References:

  1. Schrufer-Poland, T. L., Ruiz, M. P., Kassar, S., Tomassian, C., Algren, S. & Yeast, J. D. (2016). Incidence of wound complications in cesarean deliveries following closure with absorbable subcuticular staples versus conventional skin closure techniques. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 206, 53-56
  2. Nitsche, J., Howell, C., & Howell, T. (2012). Skin closure with subcuticular absorbable staples after cesarean section is associated with decreased analgesic use. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 285(4), 979-983. HYPERLINK “https://go.coopersurgical.com/obgyn-labor-and-delivery-solutions/clkn/https/doi.org/10.1007/s00404-011-2121-5″https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-011-2121-5
  3. Dresner, H. S., & Hilger, P. A. (2009). Comparison of incision closures with subcuticular and percutaneous staples. Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery, 11(5), 320-326
  4. Bron, T., & Zakine, G. (2016). Placement of absorbable dermal staples in mammaplasty and abdominoplasty: a 12-month prospective study of 60 patients. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 36(4), 459-468
  5. Patel, V., Green, J. L., Christopher, A. N., Morris, M. P., Weiss, E. S., Broach, R. B., & Butler, P. D. (2021). Use of Absorbable Dermal Stapler in Reduction Mammoplasty: Assessing Technical, Quality-of-Life, and Aesthetics Outcomes. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Global Open, 9(8), e3784ā€“e3784